> From: Nadeau Thomas, February 24, 2016 9:20 AM > > > On Feb 23, 2016:6:21 PM, at 6:21 PM, Eric Voit (evoit) <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi Kent, > > > > Thanks for running the interim, I agree it was quite useful. > > > > One thing I wanted to pull out from the minutes was the overall definition > > of > "Mount". Right now there are 830 web pages on the OpenDaylight site which > refer to "Mount" in terms of Peer Mount (i.e., something much like > draft-clemm- > netmod-mount). > > > > That does not mean that the IETF need define "Mount" the same way as an > Open Source project. But it is possible at this stage to create both > terminology > and requirements which breaks down the overall problem space. In other > words there is nothing stopping us from defining a set of terms and technology > solutions which fit together in a complimentary way. Nothing here need > conflict. > > I agree that normalizing the terminology is probably a good thing. What > I would caution against is a unilateral definition here as it is likely to be > IETF- > centric; its a good idea to poll the other communities that are using this > technology.
Makes sense. Any thoughts on who might represent the meaning of Mount from ODL? Eric > —Tom > > > > If there is community interest, I would be willing to pull together a > > strawman > requirements/terminology draft describing the differences between mounting > schemas on a box, mounting a remote datastore. > > > > Any interest? > > Eric > > > >> From: netmod, February 22, 2016 3:51 PM > >> > >> > >> Thank you all who joined today’s virtual interim meeting. > >> > >> Other than my starting the recording late and rearranging the > >> presentation order, I thought that the meeting went really well in > >> that there seems to be a lot of support for trying to solve this > >> problem, and because we have a plan to try to move towards having a > >> WG document in the BA timeframe. The plan is for > >> draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount to be updated based on the > meeting and for it to be discussed on list as the basis for the WG effort on > the > topic. > >> > >> Attached are the very rough Ethernet minutes captured during the meeting. > >> Please review carefully. Corrections can be made on the etherpad here: > >> http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/netmod-interim-20160222 (so we > >> can track changes, the end of meeting snapshot is here: > >> http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/netmod-interim- > >> 20160222/timeslider#3933) > >> > >> To listen to the recording, please follow one of these two links: > >> > >> Streaming recording link: > >> > >> https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/ldr.php?RCID=4dc88386f13a49fa8f2c934db953 > >> f4a2 > >> > >> Download recording link: > >> > >> https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/lsr.php?RCID=1b6490fe5cc6fc95d4e3c9b913df > >> dc1f > >> > >> > >> Thanks again, > >> > >> Kent and Lou > > > > _______________________________________________ > > netmod mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
