Hi, Which specific NETMOD WG charter item authorizes this work?
I have concerns about impact of this work on all YANG-based protocols. I have asked several times "how do you decide which servers need to implement the intended and applied datastores?" and never got an answer. I think an Applicability Statement is needed for this work because some systems converge so fast that the difference between intended and applied (for real edits, forget cards not plugged in) will be insignificant. Andy On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Lou Berger <[email protected]> wrote: > All, > > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-nmdsdt-netmod-revised-datastores-00 a NetMod working group > document. This document is unusual in that WG last call will be jointly > held in both the NetConf and NetMod WGs, while adoption and day-to-day > processing > will take place in NetMod. > > Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not > support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the > document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like > to see addressed once the document is a WG document. > > The poll ends December 16. > > Thank you, > NetConf and NetMod WG Chairs > > _______________________________________________ > Netconf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
