On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Lou Berger <[email protected]> wrote: > Andy, > > There are different approaches to detail in charters, I'm personally > comfortable with this work being covered by our/netmod current > charter(under supporting ongoing deployment of YANG). This said, the > chairs expect there to be discussions with our AD on respective charter > updates. Obviously the WG will have an opportunity to provide input on > any update. > > Do you have any specific changes you'd like to propose? > > I assume you mean this bullet in the charter:
The NETMOD WG may also develop any additional data models written in YANG that the WG considers core building blocks and that do not fall under the charters of other active IETF working groups. The NETMOD WG may simply add such milestones as it sees fit, with the advice and consent of the responsible AD. I do not have charter changes to propose. > Thanks, > > Lou > > Andy > > On 12/2/2016 4:44 PM, Andy Bierman wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Which specific NETMOD WG charter item authorizes this work? > > > > I have concerns about impact of this work on all YANG-based protocols. > > I have asked several times "how do you decide which servers need to > > implement the intended and applied datastores?" and never got an answer. > > > > I think an Applicability Statement is needed for this work because > > some systems > > converge so fast that the difference between intended and applied > > (for real edits, forget cards not plugged in) will be insignificant. > > > > > > Andy > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Lou Berger <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > All, > > > > This is start of a two week poll on making > > draft-nmdsdt-netmod-revised-datastores-00 a NetMod working group > > document. This document is unusual in that WG last call will be > > jointly > > held in both the NetConf and NetMod WGs, while adoption and > > day-to-day processing > > will take place in NetMod. > > > > Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not > > support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the > > document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd > > like > > to see addressed once the document is a WG document. > > > > The poll ends December 16. > > > > Thank you, > > NetConf and NetMod WG Chairs > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Netconf mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf > > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf> > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
