> On 2 Dec 2016, at 22:26, Lou Berger <[email protected]> wrote: > > All, > > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-nmdsdt-netmod-revised-datastores-00 a NetMod working group > document. This document is unusual in that WG last call will be jointly > held in both the NetConf and NetMod WGs, while adoption and day-to-day > processing > will take place in NetMod.
There seems to be no impact on YANG syntax or semantics - the one mentioned in sec. 6.3 is in fact protocol stuff that doesn't belong to the definition of YANG the language. Therefore, this work has nothing to do with data modelling and in fact belongs to the NETCONF WG. This would also solve the indicated WG schizophrenia that should IMO be avoided in any case. A useful thing to do in the NETMOD WG would be to remove all NETCONF-specific text from the YANG spec because whenever YANG is used outside the NETCONF context (I2RS, CORE), that text is mostly ignored anyway. Lada > > Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not > support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the > document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like > to see addressed once the document is a WG document. > > The poll ends December 16. > > Thank you, > NetConf and NetMod WG Chairs > > _______________________________________________ > Netconf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
