----- Original Message ----- From: "Kent Watsen" <kwat...@juniper.net> Sent: Monday, October 02, 2017 9:06 PM
> The Last Call for this document has completed with *no* responses, other than Benoit's question regarding if it should be a BCP, which also had no responses, other than my own wondering if YANG (and hence the guidelines) was stable enough. > > Lou and I discussed. It is our opinion that, given the nature of this document, the WG implicitly supports it already. So, really, the only thing that matters, is if there are any issues/concerns. Since no issues/concerns were raised, we choose to declare the Last Call successful. As for promoting it to a BCP, there appears to be no consensus to do so at this time. Accordingly, as the document shepherd, I plan to send the shepherd write-up (with these comments included) to the AD in the next few days. Kent The trouble is that a number of other things have been going on, mostly NMDA and the ramifications thereof, and so this one never moved up my todo list. Yes, it is an I-D that matters, the timing is unfortunate. Tom Petch > Looking forwards, we've created a new GitHub repo called "guidelines-next" (modeled after yang-next) to capture on-going comments/suggestions for future updates to the document: https://github.com/netmod-wg/guidelines-next. > > Kent (and Lou) > > > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
