> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder, October 18, 2017 2:22 AM > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:06:44PM +0000, Eric Voit (evoit) wrote: > > > > Section 3.10: There should be a normative set of YANG validation tools which > are run on upload of an Internet draft. Errors and warnings found later (and > perhaps through tools a user doesn't have) should not result in a module being > given an error designation. > > > > I disagree. An error is an error regardless when or how it was detected.
What I am trying to avoid is YANG errors being discovered via validation tools for which the model author has no access to before a submitted draft is accepted. However this can be accomplished is fine with me. One solution is to ensure the RFC upload process has access to all tools currently used for model validation. Eric > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
