Rob,
Thanks for all the helpful feedback!
On 01/15/2018 10:07 AM, Robert Wilton wrote:
...
>> NEW:
>>
>> If the node is augmented into the tree from another module,
>> its name is printed as <prefix>:<name>, where <prefix> is the
>> prefix defined in the module where the node is defined.
> This is OK with me, but there is still a potential for a prefix
> namespace clash (since prefixes are not guaranteed to be unique).
>
> An alternative solution would be
I don't we need to optimize for a every corner case. We have the actual
module that provides detail.
> for the YANG tree diagram to list (at
> the beginning or the end of the diagram) the mappings from prefix ->
> module name used. This has the bonus that it also explicitly lists the
> YANG modules that are being augmented, but conversely, this might end up
> just adding unnecessary noise to a diagram that should be short and
> simple ...
I think this falls in the category of unnecessary noise. At least at
this time.
Lou
(as contributor)
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
