Hi,
I just posted draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-05.txt. It
addressed the issue below, and the other WGLC issues:
o the main tree now uses 2 spaces for indentation instead of 4
o added example for expanded/unexpanded grouping
o fixed errors in the row syntax
o aligned all examples to use proper amount of whitespace
indentation
This document should now be ready to progress.
/martin
joel jaeggli <[email protected]> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> This WGLC is concluded.
>
> We have consensus to advance the document.
>
> The authors should submit an update reflecting the result of the
> dicussion on the text representation of tree diagrams not being usable
> by machine parsers.
>
> The exchange between Robert Wilton and Martin Bjorkland I think sums
> this up succinctly.
>
> (Robert)
>
> OK, so the "Providing some guidance for how to represent the tree is
> good" is along the lines of what I was thinking for the "algorithm"
> would be for 2.
>
> E.g. something along the lines of:
> "Arbitrary whitespace is allowed between any of the whitespace
> separated fields (e.g. <opts> and <type>). Additional whitespace may
> be used to column align fields (e.g. within a list or container) to
> improve readability".
>
> (Martin)
> This is fine with me. It is something in between (1) and (2) which
> people preferred. I will add this text.
>
> Thanks all, looking forward to IETF last call.
>
> joel
>
>
>
> On 1/16/18 9:24 AM, joel jaeggli wrote:
> > The current dicussion on the draft is not yet concluded. The WGLC will
> > conclude when discussion of the editorial changes is complete.
> >
> > Thanks
> > joel
> >
> > On 1/10/18 8:16 AM, joel jaeggli wrote:
> >> Just a reminder given the date that this was posted. This last call is
> >> expected to complete Monday 1/15/18.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> joel
> >>
> >>
> >> On 1/1/18 2:01 PM, joel jaeggli wrote:
> >>> Greetings,
> >>>
> >>> We hope the new year is a time to make great progess on outstanding
> >>> documents before preparation for the London IETF begins in earnest.
> >>>
> >>> This starts a two-week working group last call on:
> >>>
> >>> YANG Tree Diagrams
> >>> draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams
> >>>
> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams/
> >>>
> >>> Please send email to the list indicating your support or concerns.
> >>>
> >>> We are particularly interested in statements of the form:
> >>>
> >>> * I have reviewed this draft and found no issues.
> >>> * I have reviewed this draft and found the following issues: ...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thank you,
> >>> NETMOD WG Chairs
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> netmod mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > netmod mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
