On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 09:18:55AM -0500, Christian Hopps wrote: > > Now it seems we are supposed to wait a bunch longer on yet other works > in progress for as near as I can tell (could be wrong here as I just > don't have time to read the very long email threads that netmod > generates) capturing meta-data in a cleaner way than another. This does > *not* seem like a reason to stall this work any further. >
What is your interpretation of 'a bunch longer'? Or said differently, how much time do you think it will take to get the current schema mount approved (which has pending WG last call issues) and how much time would you find acceptable for a solution that also complies with NMDA and YANG library bis? I believe people are willing to give the later high priority. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
