In the context of holding up this work, I don't care one iota about YANG library bis, and it works just fine with NMDA AFAICT.
We need models to get work done. Thanks, Chris. Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> writes: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 09:18:55AM -0500, Christian Hopps wrote: >> >> Now it seems we are supposed to wait a bunch longer on yet other works >> in progress for as near as I can tell (could be wrong here as I just >> don't have time to read the very long email threads that netmod >> generates) capturing meta-data in a cleaner way than another. This does >> *not* seem like a reason to stall this work any further. >> > > What is your interpretation of 'a bunch longer'? Or said differently, > how much time do you think it will take to get the current schema > mount approved (which has pending WG last call issues) and how much > time would you find acceptable for a solution that also complies with > NMDA and YANG library bis? I believe people are willing to give the > later high priority. > > /js _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
