Hi Lou,

As per my public emails on this WG alias, and also private emails, you must know that both Martin, I, and others have been trying (for many weeks) to reach a compromise.


I don't think that it is that I am unwilling to compromise, but more that I perceive that a different compromise solution is the right one.  I.e. we publish a single draft that contains the model that you want now for pre NMDA solutions, and also a model that we think will work well in the post NMDA world that all of the IETF YANG models are moving to.

Thanks,
Rob


On 23/02/2018 14:36, Lou Berger wrote:
Rob,

I think we're going in circles here. We have one camp that wants to replace the current module with pre 09 and is unwilling to discuss compromise, and another camp that wants 08 published as is and has been waiting for the working group and authors to submit aversion to the IESG for publication based on the last call that completed in November.

The mail I sent that started this thread was sent with the hope of finding a compromise. As you and Martin seem uninterested in discussing a compromise, I not sure if it's worth pursuing this thread. If I have misread your mails, and you are open to compromise then we should continue this thread.

If not and there is no interest in finding a compromise in the working group and by the authors, I guess we're back to the plan of publishing 08 and looking forward to protests.

Lou



.


_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to