On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 9:56 AM John R. Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
> > There are not thousands of RFCs that include a "Module Review Checklist" > :-), which is the purpose of this erratum. Thanks. > > > > <tp> > > > > I agree. There may be lots of RFC in error because RFC8407 gets it > wrong but if the update to the lots of RFC was wanted then it should have > been investigated last Autumn when the announcement of the change to the > TLP was made, an announcement that passed me by despite being on all the > right mailing lists. > > The fix to the TLP was my idea in the first place and it's not that big of > a deal. If you follow the link and read that part of the TLP, the actual > license has never changed. We just give it the correct name now. > > I agree the checklist in Appendix A should be updated. The corrected RFC (any RFC where Errata Exists) should be available online. Not erasing the published RFC, but with a link to rfcNNNN-current (where all accepted Errata is applied). > Regards, > John Levine, [email protected], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for > Dummies", > Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly > > Andy > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
