Hi John, all,
If we want the fix to the appendix to be immediately visible to the readers (in
the rendered version), wouldn’t be more appropriate to mark this erratum as
“verified” rather than “held for doc update”?
I suppose. In 2018 when this RFC was published, the Trust still said
"Simplified" so what's in the text matches what the author intended at the
time. Not a big deal either way for me, since as I noted, the actual
license it points to has always been correct. Only the name was wrong.
R's,
John
De : Andy Bierman <[email protected]>
Envoyé : jeudi 31 mars 2022 19:11
À : John R. Levine <[email protected]>
Cc : tom petch <[email protected]>; BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
<[email protected]>; Kent Watsen <[email protected]>; [email protected];
[email protected]
Objet : Re: [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8407 (6899)
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 9:56 AM John R. Levine
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
There are not thousands of RFCs that include a "Module Review Checklist" :-),
which is the purpose of this erratum. Thanks.
<tp>
I agree. There may be lots of RFC in error because RFC8407 gets it wrong but
if the update to the lots of RFC was wanted then it should have been
investigated last Autumn when the announcement of the change to the TLP was
made, an announcement that passed me by despite being on all the right mailing
lists.
The fix to the TLP was my idea in the first place and it's not that big of
a deal. If you follow the link and read that part of the TLP, the actual
license has never changed. We just give it the correct name now.
I agree the checklist in Appendix A should be updated.
The corrected RFC (any RFC where Errata Exists) should be available online.
Not erasing the published RFC, but with a link to rfcNNNN-current (where all
accepted Errata is applied).
Regards,
John Levine, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>, Primary Perpetrator of "The
Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
Andy
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
Regards,
John Levine, [email protected], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
