Hi John, >> I would hope that web-based RFCs would either default to showing the >> "current" RFC or provide an easy way for clients to be aware that a >> "current" version is available and get a link to it. > > If you look at, say RFC 6376 at https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6376 > > There's four links to versions of the RFC. The fourth with the checkmark has > errata applied, > with links at the top to the individual errata.
Perfect! And I also see "with errata" links on the Datatracker pages too. Strange that I've never noticed them before...did they get added recently? > The regular HTML version has red "Errata Exist" at the top so you know to > look for them. Right, this is what I'm familiar with, but it's always a slog to parse through the Errata. What's new (to me) is that the very-top line of the browser window now has a "with errata" link...this was the missing piece. > Take a look. I still think that the "with errata" version should be displayed by default or, better, a popup that says "A version with Errata-fixes applied is available, would you like to see it instead?" - thoughts? > R's, > John Kent _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
