I demand that John-Mark Bell may or may not have written... > On Sat, 7 Jul 2007, Darren Salt wrote: >> I demand that John-Mark Bell may or may not have written... >> [snip] >>> Given the above, I propose the following: >>> 1) Formalise GPL version 2 as being the GPL version which NetSurf is >>> licensed under. This may be found at >>> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html >> v2 or later.
> Thanks for this. Can you please clarify your position with regards to the > "or later" clause? Which of options 1 or 2 in the linked email match your > position? "either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version". I see no reason to deny linking against GPLv3 libraries; equally, I see no reason not to use GPLv2. [snip] -- | Darren Salt | d @ youmustbejoking,demon,co,uk | nr. Ashington, | Toon | RISC OS, Linux | s zap,tartarus,org | Northumberland | Army | <URL:http://www.youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk/> (PGP 2.6, GPG keys) Beware of geeks bearing graft.
