On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:51:32 +0200 Amin Kharchi <amin....@kharchi.eu> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:37:41 +0100, Rob Kendrick > <r...@netsurf-browser.org> wrote: > > >> That really surprises me. I always thought that John-Mark c.s. were > >> genuine RISC OS users. Apparently, the assumption that contribution > >> to a RISC OS mailing list implies RISC OS usership, is indicating a > >> lazy mind - which, in fact, is true for me indeed. > > > > I don't think any of us use RISC OS any more in any serious way; > > certainly not the ones with any time to contribute. > > Then the homepage of netsurf lies! Sorry for this words. But if > somebody visit www.netsurf-browser.org he will think RISC OS is the > main platform of netsurf. And the last mails in this list say the > contrary. Currently, the RISC OS front end is the most complete. That much is true. However, it's blocking the other front ends from catching up. > It would be fair for any RISC OS user if the homepage says the truth: > RISC OS has no priority! Its only the rest. The RISC OS front end is as high priority as any of the others. Please don't be sensational. The problem is that nobody's willing to do it. B.
