In article <20090919113634.422f6...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net>, Rob Kendrick <r...@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
> I think you can assume that if everybody's missed your point, it is > your explanation of it that is at fault. Perhaps you could try again? I have not given a simple explanation so I can't try again; but I didn't expect everyone to be so slow on the uptake. ;-) Just think about what the motivation was to ask for 500 (FIVE HUNDRED) people to fund development of ANY RISC OS app before results are known of the outcome. (We have all been kicked in the balls too often by jam tomorrow scenarios I'll wager). I was responding to the bleaters who think you and others should drop everything and get on with the RISC OS stuff. A few people may commit to paying someone who otherwise has no time but will 500? That was rhetorical, by the way. As I said elsewhere, if the sky turns yellow with pink spots and 500 people commit to support a developer, it won't necessarily be me - the pledge is just worded that way. Is that clear now? -- Tim Hill, www.timil.com
