Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 17:12:41 -100
From: Gianluca Nucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: LOADFIX QUESTION
In 2000-04-11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] dice:
>By the way, I experimented with using LOADFIX in DRDOS 7.03 to load
>and run NETTAMER.EXE. It loaded and ran, all right, but there was
>less conventional memory available as reported by Net-Tamer (not a
>full 64K less, but about 46000 bytes). Since many people cry about
>not having enough conventional memory available, it would seem that
>using LOADFIX is not a good idea _unless_ you use it to solve the
>particular problem that is mentioned in help for LOADFIX: A
>program won't load and/or you get a "Packed file corrupt" message.
Well I think that if you don't have problems with "packed file corrupt" or
so on, it may be the sabe to use or not to use loadfix because a prg starts
automatically using conventional memory.
Best wishes,
Gianluca
********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list,
send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the single word
Unsubscribe
as the subject.
You MUST use the same address with which you subscribed!
********************************************************
