Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 11:21:52 -700
From: Walter Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Preliminary Evaluation of Net-Tamer Version 1.12.0
John:
I can't comment on Tom's effort to pass on a bug list which
David Colston was to consider because I don't know what ultimately
happened to that project. It would be interesting to see what David
Colston has to say about that list. As for retaining multiple
versions of Net-Tamer: that does seem warranted -- especially for
those who need to run the XT/286 software on a machine that's a 286
or a lesser computer.
Walter Scott
In Message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Oram
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> had the following to say on Wed, 14 Jun 2000
10:01:35 -0500:
JO> Appears that those of us who have a combination working for the specific
JO> uses we put NT too, should probably test the latest BUT NOT toss out
JO> what we have made to work for our own DOS platforms.
JO>
JO> Net-tamer seems mired in the never-never land of being a very excellent
JO> idea, which has a loyal following. Net-tamer also reminds me of the Novi
JO> V-8's that ran at Indy 500's - long on promise but never could finish
JO> the race...
JO>
JO> I was also wondering about your thoughts regarding all the effort put
JO> forth by the loyal fans of Net-tamer and the (in)famous bug list project
JO> you, Tom, Jeff, and many others worked on???
<><> News & Views, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, are the Net <><>
NTReader v0.27a(O)/Beta (Registered) in conjunction with Net-Tamer.
********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list,
send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the single word
Unsubscribe
as the subject.
You MUST use the same address with which you subscribed!
********************************************************
