in-line :-
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 09:57, Anivar Aravind <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2009/10/5 shirish शिरीष <[email protected]>:
>> in-line :-
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 08:13, Vickram Crishna <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> [....]
>>
>>> It is true that some people respond powerfully to graphics, however, I can
>>> think of one particularly powerful listmember for whom this will be fairly
>>> useless, if not negative.
>>> 'Average' is not 'everyone', is the point I am making.
>>
>> accepted. I was just trying to make the point that graphics is a good
>> enabler.
>>
>> To raise another point which KK was trying to make in the other thread
>> but without taking any examples.
>>
>
> I cant find any reason for going Off Topic here
I didn't want to go OT but questions about accessibility were also
asked on this and other threads in general so didn't want to start a
new thread on this .
A point I was also trying to make is you could have both (graphics as
well as an alternative body of text) so you are able to target both
kinds of people 'Average' as well as 'not everyone' as per your
definition.
> Anivar
>
> --
> "[It is not] possible to distinguish between 'numerical' and
> 'nonnumerical' algorithms, as if numbers were somehow different from
> other kinds of precise information." - Donald Knuth
--
Regards,
Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल
My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17
_______________________________________________
network mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
