On 14 February 2011 11:49, sankarshan <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 2:38 PM, sankarshan <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Indranil Das Gupta <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> Without throwing a wet blanket on to this but "The huge amount of data >> populated should be compatible in any Database languages like >> PostgreSQL, MySQL etc." and, "...to ensure 99 % uptime in performance >> of the system." etc sound a bit not completely thought out. Another >> example being "High end database security and user end privileges >> should be ensured" but makes no mention of any standards that need to >> be adhered to and complied with. >> >> The timeline doesn't specifically mention dates/times when the code >> commits happen to publicly available repositories. It also doesn't >> mention the study and assessment period required to consume/modify/use >> APIs/data-drivers for the existing applications/modules. And, yet it >> seems to be fixed cost project with pre-determined dates. >> >> Would anyone be knowing as to who wrote the content ? > > Was anyone able to get in touch with the authors of the document and > rectify the errors ?
There could have been times where genuine needs were advertised. Today, without batting an eyelid, many of us would vouch that the intended awardees of such contracts usually are the ones who draft the conditions. Why take pains to find fault with such a corrupt system to make it appear technically correct ? -- CK Raju _______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
