On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Narendra Sisodiya <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:49 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Tuesday 18 Oct 2011 02:23:05 Vivek Khurana wrote: >> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Narendra Sisodiya >> > >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > show me some example where CC-By content got exploited !! Its like >> > > "SEA >> > >> > Remember the case of Kalyaan Verma's photo being used in TOI ? > > Kalyaan Verma licensed under "NC" terms and conditions > - http://kalyanvarma.net/journal/2010/02/11/toi-steals-cc-works/ > So it was illgally used by TOI. > That was not my question. > I want a case where a Profit making LALA kind of business man exploited a > Non-NC work. I guess this in the only worry a person has which provoke him > to use NC clause.
Ample of examples on the internet. Forget CC, publishers exploit Copyrighted work too. A simple google search will throw many cases of ALL RIGHTS RESERVED photographs being used by international publishers without asking for permission. Infact one of my photographs http://www.flickr.com/photos/vivekkhurana/4403614273/in/set-72157623547780522/ was used by DNA Pune when covering GNUNIFY 10. The photograph was copyrighted and they used it without my permission and without giving me credits. Incidently, one of the organizers and a well known face in FOSS world had pointed DNA Pune to photographs by participants without caring about license terms and DNA ended up using one of them thinking this is part of official photographs (apologies followed later). So, my point is when publishers dont care about copyrighted work do you think they will bother about giving Attribution to CC license? NC atleast gives some teeth to the content creator against such publishers. regards Vivek -- The hidden harmony is better than the obvious!! _______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
