On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Narendra Sisodiya <[email protected]> wrote: > > Kalyaan Verma licensed under "NC" terms and conditions > - http://kalyanvarma.net/journal/2010/02/11/toi-steals-cc-works/ > So it was illgally used by TOI. > That was not my question. > I want a case where a Profit making LALA kind of business man exploited a > Non-NC work. I guess this in the only worry a person has which provoke him > to use NC clause. > If "Kalyaan Verma" would have used CC-By or CC-by-SA and then imagine TOI > used it for PROFIT then may someone calculate that how much extra money TOI > will get to its revenue just because of Kalyaan Verma's photos. > If Kalyaan Verma want that nobody should get a single paisa with using his > photos then he would have used "ALL Right Reserved, Permission granted only > to see it in this form and copying/saving and doing anything else is not > permitted."
When I said "ignorance is rarely a bliss" I said it intentionally and carefully. Cause you are showing your ignorance repeatedly and seem to have single point agenda of pushing your opinion on others. The image used by TOI is here available here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Otomops_wroughtoni.jpg Please read the license CAREFULLY, it is CC BY SA along with the upload date. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED is different from what NC clause says. If I am making a collection and distributing it for free, do you think NC clause will be a hindrance? If NC clause is not acceptable, then dual licensed open source software should not be acceptable to you. In most of the cases, just asking for permission for distribution is sufficient for NC clause wavier. regards Vivek -- The hidden harmony is better than the obvious!! _______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
