On Monday 01 September 2014 05:56 PM, Sanjeev Gupta wrote: > I do not know enough about Mr Snowden's "as per", since his information > is still being revealed in daily doses via the Guardian, and other media. > > I will stipulate, for this argument, that Mr Snowden provided > inconvertible evidence that the NSA read my email. > > And you read a file from my Dropbox. > > So what? The latter is likely to be a crime, the former is not.
Excuse me, can you site the relevant section of Indian law which gives NSA rights to read your email? > You or I walking around with a gun is an offence; the 3rd Rajputana > Rifles marching with mortars down Rajpath is not. There is a reason it > is called "The State". Right or wrong, a State may take actions that it > forbids its citizens to do. I did not know this too. I thought states are restricted by constitution, a contract between the citizen or state. Or are you saying might is right? Then why are we even having the debate? These crackers had the might to break and take personal photos. > Krishnakant, the loss to the people whose privacy was invaded exists, > irrespective of what other people have lost. When you stub your toe, me > talking about how others have lost their legs does not help your pain, > nor (imn my opinion) is it an appropriate response. It gives a perspective into the scale of loss and sometimes helps to such perspectives allow us to channel our angers at the bigger issues.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
