Sebastien Roy wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Sheesh, what's with all these nominations for core-contributor? > > > As a project lead for a large OpenSolaris project endorsed by this > community and someone who's been contributing to Solaris networking > for over a decade, I was view myself as a core contributor, yet I > can't vote. I see the same two or three people doing all of the > voting in this community, and there are far more than two or three > core contributors. We need core contributors who will actually, um, > contribute. I plan on doing that, and that's why I nominated myself.
Two things: 1) I'd like to see the voting moved away from email to a web page. 2) timezones affect who can respond in a meaningful way to requests for votes. It's also tempting to suggest that how voting is done, too... For instance, if I round up 3 others here in MPK, suggest something at 6pm, we all vote on it, there's no chance for any meaningful interaction from outsiders. Rules get followed but that's not in the spirit of things. I'm not sure I see the point of core contributors and I'd like to see the whole [core] contributor model examined for its suitability to OpenSolaris. btw, is anyone from networking in Burlington thinking about coming to CA for the OpenSolaris summit (and the Sun event following that)? It would be nice for at least one or two to make it over. Darren _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
