[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Two things: > 1) I'd like to see the voting moved away from email to a web page.
Likewise. > 2) timezones affect who can respond in a meaningful way to requests > for votes. > > It's also tempting to suggest that how voting is done, too... > > For instance, if I round up 3 others here in MPK, suggest > something at 6pm, we all vote on it, there's no chance for > any meaningful interaction from outsiders. Rules get followed > but that's not in the spirit of things. Surely not. Maybe there needs to be some lifetime to a vote on a proposed action. I don't see such a concept in the constitution. > I'm not sure I see the point of core contributors and I'd like > to see the whole [core] contributor model examined for its > suitability to OpenSolaris. Sounds like a discussion waiting to happen on ogb-discuss. > btw, is anyone from networking in Burlington thinking about > coming to CA for the OpenSolaris summit (and the Sun event > following that)? It would be nice for at least one or two to > make it over. It would be nice, and I'm not sure. I'm attempting to arrange for travel for the week before that for an unrelated conference, so it may be difficult for me to do both (due to personal commitments.) -Seb _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
