Sebastien Roy wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >>2) timezones affect who can respond in a meaningful way to requests >> for votes. >> >>It's also tempting to suggest that how voting is done, too... >> >>For instance, if I round up 3 others here in MPK, suggest >>something at 6pm, we all vote on it, there's no chance for >>any meaningful interaction from outsiders. Rules get followed >>but that's not in the spirit of things. >> >> > >Surely not. Maybe there needs to be some lifetime to a vote on a >proposed action. I don't see such a concept in the constitution. > >
Or there needs to be a "quiet period" after a nomination before a vote or something...as it is right now, it looks a tad ridiculous and bordering on a joke (and as someone who has voted, it feels stupid having to do it, too.) >>I'm not sure I see the point of core contributors and I'd like >>to see the whole [core] contributor model examined for its >>suitability to OpenSolaris. >> >> > >Sounds like a discussion waiting to happen on ogb-discuss. > > Or the developer summit :) Darren _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
