> Okay, that's good information. Given that you _always_ try and open the > door fd on demand in dladm_door_cal(), then I don't see why you bother > to try and open it in dladm_open(). That code can just be removed I > think.
I agree with Seb. As it is, we're opening a descriptor we may not need *and* we're adding more code to do it. -- meem _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
