Except that we did. It's been something 1st brought up and considered at least 3 years ago, except we used the FreeBSD "ports" analogy, which is much better IMO :) Chuck Murcko wrote: > > I think nobody answered because this is pretty obviously the next Right > Thing to do in distributing httpd and we're to embarassed to admit we > didn't think of it first. 8^) > > On Thursday, April 19, 2001, at 05:14 PM, Theo Schlossnagle wrote: > > > > > Let me throw in a different perspective of things. > > ... > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Chuck Murcko > Topsail Group > http://www.topsail.org/ > -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody."
- Re: proxy maintenance (was: Re: [VOTE] mod_p... Graham Leggett
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Graham Leggett
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Chuck Murcko
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Chuck Murcko
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Theo Schlossnagle
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Victor J. Orlikowski
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Sander van Zoest
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Chris Pepper
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Chuck Murcko
- RE: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Ian Holsman
- httpd distrib - was: Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Jim Jagielski
- httpd distrib - was: Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Chuck Murcko
- Re: httpd distrib - was: Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in... Jim Winstead
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Theo E. Schlossnagle
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Graham Leggett
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Chuck Murcko
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Bill Stoddard
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Chuck Murcko
