Perhaps I'll draw a flame (or a veto) but the question was asked at the start of this
thread and it
received more then three +1's and a -0 from Greg as I recall. Chuck solicited for a
"do you want to
change your vote" and got no responses. So it is clear to go in IMHO.
Bill
> Chuck Murcko wrote:
>
> > I think nobody answered because this is pretty obviously the next Right
> > Thing to do in distributing httpd and we're to embarassed to admit we
> > didn't think of it first. 8^)
>
> Trouble is - we're getting ahead of ourselves. These are all great
> ideas, and should be acted on, but the short term immediate problem
> remains:
>
> As of now, the proxy is not part of the main distribution. As a result,
> it's not getting the widespread build testing that it now needs (my
> trusty little Powerbook isn't going to handle all platform testing :))).
>
> The original request was to add the current we-think-is-stable version
> of the proxy to the main 2.0 tree so that it can get some build exposure
> and see if the thing WorksForYou as opposed to just WorksForMe :)
>
> So as a short term solution until a long term solution can be hammered
> out - can we add the proxy?
>
