Well, technically, yes, but I think we might have a better idea in using
this to finally go to something like FreeBSD ports for distribution.
And dump all those pesky modules from the core. 8^) Really, all of 'em
just go into the rollup build, if they work. Simple.
Chuck
On Friday, April 20, 2001, at 02:06 PM, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> Perhaps I'll draw a flame (or a veto) but the question was asked at the
> start of this thread and it
> received more then three +1's and a -0 from Greg as I recall. Chuck
> solicited for a "do you want to
> change your vote" and got no responses. So it is clear to go in IMHO.
>
> Bill
>
>> Chuck Murcko wrote:
>>
>>> I think nobody answered because this is pretty obviously the next
>>> Right
>>> Thing to do in distributing httpd and we're to embarassed to admit we
>>> didn't think of it first. 8^)
>>
>> Trouble is - we're getting ahead of ourselves. These are all great
>> ideas, and should be acted on, but the short term immediate problem
>> remains:
>>
>> As of now, the proxy is not part of the main distribution. As a result,
>> it's not getting the widespread build testing that it now needs (my
>> trusty little Powerbook isn't going to handle all platform
>> testing :))).
>>
>> The original request was to add the current we-think-is-stable version
>> of the proxy to the main 2.0 tree so that it can get some build
>> exposure
>> and see if the thing WorksForYou as opposed to just WorksForMe :)
>>
>> So as a short term solution until a long term solution can be hammered
>> out - can we add the proxy?
>>
>
>
>
Chuck Murcko
Topsail Group
http://www.topsail.org/
