Tagging is fine, assuming that Jeff's fixes to my big Makefile changes last night made it in and the tree was compile-tested first. However, you should have bumped all of the magic numbers as well. We have reached the stage where people have to be forced to recompile rather than reuse the last beta's binaries. I'll see if I can bump the numbers myself. ....Roy
- Tagging Apache 2.0 for beta candidate Bill Stoddard
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for beta candidate Graham Leggett
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for beta candidate William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for beta candidat... rbb
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for beta candidat... Bill Stoddard
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for beta cand... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for beta... Bill Stoddard
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for ... Bill Stoddard
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 ... Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for ... Greg Stein
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 ... Graham Leggett
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 ... Greg Stein
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 ... Graham Leggett
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for ... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 ... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 ... Greg Stein
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 ... Graham Leggett
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for ... Graham Leggett
- .Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for beta candidate William A. Rowe, Jr.
