Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for beta candidate

[Graham Leggett]

Greg Stein wrote:

> Even better, the proxy guys should say "okay. we have verified that our
> stuff works with the 2.0.18 tarball, so let's release an apache+proxy
> tarball."

Really yuck for the end user.

There should be just one archive out there. There is no point in
releasing an archive with A in it, then something with A+B - it's a
complete waste of time.

> How was FirstBill to know whether proxy should have been included
> or not? Was it stable and did it work against 2.0.18? No... he doesn't know
> that.

Then lets finalise the decision and they will know.

Regards,
Graham
-- 
-----------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                "There's a moon
                                        over Bourbon Street
                                                tonight..."

S/MIME Cryptographic Signature