Greg Stein wrote:
> Right. We have a beta that people can use and test. The point is to get this
> stuff out to users. It would be great to have more features, but we can't
> keep waiting for each person's feature to be completed before whame send it out
> the door. We need to be able to send intermediates out.
Right now the proxy has been waiting for over a month to get out to some
users. If you're trying to get Apache out to users, why are you trying
to stop proxy going out to users?
Regards,
Gra
--
-----------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "There's a moon
over Bourbon Street
tonight..."
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for beta cand... Bill Stoddard
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for beta... Bill Stoddard
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for ... Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for beta... Greg Stein
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for ... Graham Leggett
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for ... Greg Stein
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for ... Graham Leggett
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for beta... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for ... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for ... Greg Stein
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for ... Graham Leggett
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for beta... Graham Leggett
- .Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for beta candidate William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for beta candidate Jeff Trawick
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for beta candidate rbb
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for beta candidate Greg Stein
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for beta candidat... Bill Stoddard
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for beta cand... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- RE: Tagging Apache 2.0 for beta candidate Ian Holsman
- Re: Tagging Apache 2.0 for beta candidate Graham Leggett
- RE: Tagging Apache 2.0 for beta candidate GOMEZ Henri
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature