From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 4:58 PM
> From: "Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 3:22 PM
>
> I'm not suggesting we retag the httpd-2.0 tree!!! Just provide a single tarball
> for folks to jump on this module in this beta.
>
> > Since the tree is relatively stable now and we do not freeze development before
> > tagging a tree, now seems to be a good time to try for a beta.
> > It is not a big deal to roll the proxy
> > tarball and make it available to work with 2.0.18. We can include it next
> > time around.
>
> Why not simply tag proxy, [SAME TAG!] and add it to the tarball? How hard
> is that?
I've just slapped the APACHE_2_0_18 tag on the httpd-proxy tree, effective the same
timetable as httpd-2.0's tag.
If the modproxy folks want to check out the proxy tree, grab the tarball, insert
proxy-2.0 into that package, and retar it as httpd-proxy-2.0.18.tar I believe that
could make everyone happy, no?
If that package isn't up to snuff, then we release the non-proxy tarball as the
beta, instead. And ITMT figure out how to release a single tarball easily.
Since FirstBill has limited time, it's not too much to ask this of proxy folk,
who are more ready to assure the package builds.
Objections?
Bill
