On 21 May 2001, Jeff Trawick wrote:

> "Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I think we have a good shot at a beta candidate. I plan to tag the tree
> > early this afternoon (ET) unless I hear objections.
>
> I think it is fine for that tarball to go out as a beta as long as we
> make a patch available for srclib/apr-util/Makefile.in to use with RH
> 7.1 (and whatever other platforms may be affected).

Whoah.  We have a tarball that we know doesn't build on RH 7.1 at the very
least.  That is not a beta tarball.  That would be an alpha tarball.
Release it as an alpha, at least that's my vote.

Ryan

_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom                              [EMAIL PROTECTED]
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to