Be careful on the sea. We don't need another "Perfect Storm" loss. :)
--
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-796-9023
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Ames [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 12:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Apache 2.0 final ?
>
>
> "Jeffrey A. Stuart" wrote:
> >
> > Ok, I've emailed this a couple of times and I'm gonna say
> it once again. :)
> > We NEED Apache 2.0 out ASAP. We needed Apache 2.0 out in
> January. We needed
> > a beta back last year at the end of September or October
> whenever the UK
> > ApacheCon was. I can't stress this enough. Apache is
> starting to fall behind
> > technologically. I have a friend of mine who had to switch
> from Apache to
> > Zeus cause Apache couldn't handle the load. He was only
> able to get a max
> > throughput of 12 Mb/s out of Apache and he PERSONALLY was
> able to get 40 Mb/s
> > out of Zeus. AND he told me that he's heard of people
> doing 80 Mb/s through
> > Zeus.
> >
> > We NEED Apache 2.0. :) I think the multi proc/multi
> threaded model will
> > really give some oomph to the server. Combine that soon
> with mod_perl 2.0 and
> > some other technologies out there and we can compete with
> Zeus and some of the
> > other web servers in high load applications.
> >
>
> I hear you loud and clear, Jeff. Why don't you give the 2_0_16 beta
> tarball a shot? It's really in pretty good shape. That's
> what we have
> running on apache.org, with a couple of debug patches added.
>
> Sunday I'm leaving for the British Virgin Islands to bring a sailboat
> back to Destin, FL :) . But for the rest of the week and after I get
> back (we're figuring 10-14 days) I'll be happy to work with you on
> getting 2.0 running. There are plenty of other folks on this list who
> will pitch in and help you as well.
>
> Greg
>
