Bill Stoddard wrote: > > I agree with Cliff. The API is reasonably stable and has been for a few months now. Oh yeah? How come I have to patch the experimental modules every time I try to build them, then? (OK, the patches are minor...) Cheers, Ben. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
- RE: Apache 2.0 final ? Jeffrey A. Stuart
- Re: Apache 2.0 final ? Greg Ames
- RE: Apache 2.0 final ? Jeffrey A. Stuart
- Re: Apache 2.0 final ? Greg Stein
- RE: Apache 2.0 final ? Jeffrey A. Stuart
- Re: Apache 2.0 final ? Aris Stathakis
- RE: Apache 2.0 final ? Jeffrey A. Stuart
- RE: Apache 2.0 final ? Padwa, Daniel
- RE: Apache 2.0 final ? Cliff Woolley
- Re: Apache 2.0 final ? Bill Stoddard
- Re: Apache 2.0 final ? Ben Laurie
- Re: Apache 2.0 final ? Sander Temme
- Re: Apache 2.0 final ? Jeff Trawick
- Re: Apache 2.0 final ? Ben Laurie
- Re: Apache 2.0 final ? Cliff Woolley
- Re: Apache 2.0 final ? Sander Temme
- Re: Apache 2.0 final ? rbb
- Re: Apache 2.0 final ? Bill Stoddard
- Re: Apache 2.0 final ? Jeff Trawick
- RE: Apache 2.0 final ? Ian Holsman
- RE: Apache 2.0 final ? Gonyou, Austin
