<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In all, I am -0.9 for this patch, I won't veto it, but I don't want
> to see it in the code. If we do put the -X back in, then remove
> -DONE_PROCESS. Having both is just bogus.
As a compromise, maybe we could have -X (or --help?) tell the user to
use -DONE_PROCESS. It's kind of ugly, and I suppose it might be
difficult to draw the line on what gets this sort of backwards
compatibility treatment. OTOH, this was one of the first things I
noticed about 2.0 as well..."how the heck do I do -X?!".
Just a thought...
--
David N. Welton
Free Software: http://people.debian.org/~davidw/
Apache Tcl: http://tcl.apache.org/
Personal: http://www.efn.org/~davidw/
Work: http://www.innominate.com/
