+1 > I don't > think the issue would come up so often if people could easily figure out > how to get into the -X style debugging mode. It's only when you can't > figure it out and can't find the information on how to do it that you get > frustrated and bring up the issue on the list. Can we either have -X > return a hint and then exit() or let a help screen do the trick? Or > something? I'm not as attached to -X doing the deed as I am to being able > to quickly figure out that -DONE_PROCESS is what you should use. > > <shrug> > > --Cliff > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Cliff Woolley > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Charlottesville, VA > >
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functionality rbb
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functionality Cliff Woolley
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functionality David N. Welton
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functionality Aaron Bannert
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functionality Ben Laurie
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functionality William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functionality Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functionality rbb
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functionality Cliff Woolley
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functionalit... Bill Stoddard
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functionality rbb
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functionality David N. Welton
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functionalit... David N. Welton
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functionality dean gaudet
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functionality Roy T. Fielding
