From: "Ben Laurie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 5:39 PM
> Aaron Bannert wrote:
> > p.s. why would "!!" fix bugs on some platforms if ap_exists_config_define
> > can only return 0 or 1? I can only see using !! to normalize some non-bool
> > return to 0/1 for some weird logic, and even then it's not readable.
>
> As I was responsible for !!, I guess I should explain. The original
> version was flag=!!getenv("SOMETHING").
>
> I agree it isn't totally readable, and asked permission before including
> it.
True, flag = (getenv("SOMETHING") != NULL) is much clearer.
- [PATCH] Add back -X functionality Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functionality rbb
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functionality Cliff Woolley
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functionality David N. Welton
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functionality Aaron Bannert
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functionality Ben Laurie
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functionalit... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functionality Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functionality rbb
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functionalit... Cliff Woolley
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functio... Bill Stoddard
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functionality rbb
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functionalit... David N. Welton
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functio... David N. Welton
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functionality dean gaudet
- Re: [PATCH] Add back -X functionality Roy T. Fielding
