Re: Accept mutex

[Jim Jagielski]

Bill Stoddard wrote:
> I have expressed my distaste for the "one mutex fits all" approach of APR for quite a
> while.  +1
> 

I'm thinking that one I implement the 2.0 version, it makes sense for
the 1.3 tree as well (I know, feature creep). But it's also much easier
under 1.3 :)
-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
                    "It's *good* to be the King."