I bet you're right :)
Bill Stoddard wrote:
>
>
> > Bill Stoddard wrote:
> > > I have expressed my distaste for the "one mutex fits all" approach of APR for
>quite a
> > > while. +1
> > >
> >
> > I'm thinking that one I implement the 2.0 version, it makes sense for
> > the 1.3 tree as well (I know, feature creep). But it's also much easier
> > under 1.3 :)
>
> Cool. I bet the problem you are trying to fix is the one I would like to fix :-)
>
> Bill
>
--
===========================================================================
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"It's *good* to be the King."
