Re: Accept mutex

[Bill Stoddard]

> Bill Stoddard wrote:
> > I have expressed my distaste for the "one mutex fits all" approach of APR for 
>quite a
> > while.  +1
> > 
> 
> I'm thinking that one I implement the 2.0 version, it makes sense for
> the 1.3 tree as well (I know, feature creep). But it's also much easier
> under 1.3 :)

Cool.  I bet the problem you are trying to fix is the one I would like to fix :-)

Bill