Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bill Stoddard wrote:
> > I have expressed my distaste for the "one mutex fits all" approach of APR for
>quite a
> > while. +1
> >
>
> I'm thinking that one I implement the 2.0 version, it makes sense for
> the 1.3 tree as well (I know, feature creep). But it's also much easier
> under 1.3 :)
+1 for you implementing it for 1.3.x... I won't barge in this time :)
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
