"Peter J. Cranstone" wrote:
> To garner more acceptance of Apache 2.0 it would probably be smart to
> run some sample test configs of 1.3.x vs. 2.x and publish the actual
> performance metrics.
>
> It's now a marketing job to convince people that the new features are
> worth moving to. The real key is going to be performance. It needs to be
> at least 10% faster (preferably higher than that) before people are
> going to start porting all their modules etc over.
The major push in v2.0 (I think anyway) has been on features and not
performance. Just the addition of the filters based architecture is an
enormous selling point for Apache v2.0 - which makes a whole host of
things possible that were not before.
Regards,
Graham
--
-----------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "There's a moon
over Bourbon Street
tonight..."
- Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up Ryan Bloom
- Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up Bill Stoddard
- Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up Greg Ames
- Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up Sebastian Bergmann
- Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up TOKILEY
- Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up Sebastian Bergmann
- Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up Sebastian Bergmann
- Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up Bill Stoddard
- Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up Cliff Woolley
- RE: 2.0.23 tarballs up Peter J. Cranstone
- RE: 2.0.23 tarballs up Graham Leggett
- RE: 2.0.23 tarballs up Peter J. Cranstone
- RE: 2.0.23 tarballs up Gonyou, Austin
- Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up Ryan Bloom
- Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up Greg Ames
- RE: 2.0.23 tarballs up Gonyou, Austin
- RE: 2.0.23 tarballs up Gonyou, Austin
- RE: 2.0.23 tarballs up Gonyou, Austin
- Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up Chuck Murcko
- Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up William A. Rowe, Jr.
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature