On the thought of +1 for GA with no threaded mpm. I'd have to say NO WAY. As someone who's constantly trying to push apache beyond it's limits, I can easily break 1.3.x on our current hardware. That said, the same hardware with apache 2.0 and threaded MPM serving static pages can easily go to nearly 3 times that of 1.3.x. That just extended the life of our hardware for another year or more, or possibly obosoleted it in favor of LESS servers with beefier statistics. Either way, we're getting more bang for the buck by using the threaded MPM versus prefork. Thanks for listening. +1 for beta, if it means anything. :) -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up Greg Ames
- Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up Sebastian Bergmann
- Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up TOKILEY
- Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up Sebastian Bergmann
- Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up Sebastian Bergmann
- Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up Bill Stoddard
- Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up Cliff Woolley
- RE: 2.0.23 tarballs up Peter J. Cranstone
- Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up Graham Leggett
- RE: 2.0.23 tarballs up Peter J. Cranstone
- Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up Gonyou, Austin
- Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up Ryan Bloom
- Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up Greg Ames
- RE: 2.0.23 tarballs up Gonyou, Austin
- RE: 2.0.23 tarballs up Gonyou, Austin
- RE: 2.0.23 tarballs up Gonyou, Austin
- Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up Chuck Murcko
- Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: 2.0.23 ZIP is up William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up TOKILEY
