Sorry..Had to do some sun stuff. I have seen issues with the graceful. I'm
checking 2_0_24-dev which I was using at DRK. I'll check the graceful on it.
Would you like to know info about the more recent CVS?
--
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-796-9023
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gonyou, Austin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 10:41 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: 2.0.23 tarballs up
>
>
> I'll let you know asap..I'm in the middle of an issue right now.
>
>
> --
> Austin Gonyou
> Systems Architect, CCNA
> Coremetrics, Inc.
> Phone: 512-796-9023
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg Ames [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 10:18 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up
> >
> >
> > "Gonyou, Austin" wrote:
> > >
> > > On the thought of +1 for GA with no threaded mpm. I'd have
> > to say NO WAY. As
> > > someone who's constantly trying to push apache beyond it's
> > limits, I can
> > > easily break 1.3.x on our current hardware. That said, the
> > same hardware
> > > with apache 2.0 and threaded MPM serving static pages can
> > easily go to
> > > nearly 3 times that of 1.3.x. That just extended the life
> > of our hardware
> > > for another year or more, or possibly obosoleted it in
> > favor of LESS servers
> > > with beefier statistics. Either way, we're getting more
> > bang for the buck by
> > > using the threaded MPM versus prefork. Thanks for
> > listening. +1 for beta, if
> > > it means anything. :)
> >
> > Austin, you know I'm listening. That's exactly what I expect with
> > threaded in 2.0.23.
> >
> > Since you may have more experience in a production environment than
> > anyone in the world at the moment, are you seeing any kind glitches
> > whatsoever with graceful restarts? Or anything else, for
> that matter?
> >
> > Greg
> >
>
