From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 7:02 PM
> I think once the original Win32 project files are stored 'as-is' into
> the tarball ( as binary versus text to preserve CR/LF ) then this is
> all a moot point and both PKZIPW and WinZip will produce a
> loadable Apache.dsw project. That's the way it's always been
> but I might be the only one left using PKZIPW for Win32 so
> it probably doesn't matter.
That's absolutly bogus nonsense.
Some 90% of the sources are _text_files_. (10% or whatever are graphics.)
A text file is a text file is a text file.
CVS knows the difference [for a reason].
If I'm on a 390, I have a bunch of ebcdic files. So what? They are text.
They don't go into a repository as binary, unless they have some really bizzare
formatting or escapes in them.
I'm fixing my lineends.pl file that will cleanly translate the line endings on
a unix or dos machine into unix or dos. Then anyone can use zip on unix to create
the win32 image. The only hangup? Perl's utime isn't doing what I expected on
Unix, so it's touch'ing the date stamps when I coded it not to.
There will be no binary .dsp or .dsw files in cvs. ever.
Bill