William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>From: "Ian Holsman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:18 AM
>
>
>>William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>
>>>>jerenkrantz 01/08/16 17:26:38
>>>>
>>>> * use apu_dbm in mod_auth_dbm
>>>> Status: Greg +1 (low-priority volunteer)
>>>> + Justin says: "Seems like this is already there, so should we just
>>>> + remove the other DBM code in that file? If you want
>>>> + to use gdbm, or dbm, etc, you should tell apr-util."
>>>>
>>>I'm not sure about this.
>>>
>>>If a user has many (existing) gdbm user databases, but would rather use Berkley db
>>>for caching performance in the bits like mod_ssl and mod_usertrack, why should we
>>>cripple their auth_dbm?
>>>
>>this would be better solved with apr-util allow multiple DB types to be
>>created
>>(similiar to how SMS works)
>>
>>maybe a apr_dbm_create_gdbm()
>> apr_dbm_create_berkley_db()
>> apr_dbm_create_ndbm()
>>set of routines is required
>>
>
>+1 (have a patch to offer :-?)
>
not yet.
but soon
